Documents/Resources
Central America
·
Agreement
on Socioeconomic Aspects and the Agrarian Situation signed between the
Guatemalan Government and the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity [URNG] in
Mexico City on 6 May, 1996 To
strengthen real, functional, and participatory democracies and comprise: a)
consensus and dialogue between representatives of the socioeconomic development:
b) consensus between these representatives and state institutions in the
drafting and implementation of strategies and development actions; and c)
peoples' effective participation in identifying, setting priorities and
fulfilling their needs. Citizens' participation in the socioeconomic development
as well as being a democratization factor is essential to improve productivity
and economic growth, for equitable distribution of wealth and assessment of
human potential. With this disposition and in accordance with the agreements on
the Resettlement of the Peoples Uprooted by the Armed Conflict and Indian
Identity and Rights, the parties concur that it is important to create or
strengthen mechanisms that allow citizens and different social groups to
effectively exercise their rights and fully participate in the decision making
on different issues that affect or interest them, with full awareness and in a
manner that responsibly fulfills social obligations on personal and collective
matters.
- Empowerment
and Survival: Humanitarian Work in Civil Conflict
By Martha Thompson (published by Oxam, 1996).
This two-part article explores the experience of living and working
for poverty-focused NGOs in a civil war whose roots lay in the chronically
inequitable distribution of power and access to resources. Based on 12
years’ work in Central America, the article reflects on the demands and
constraints placed on international aid workers in the context of civil
conflict; and on the ways in which relationships with local organizations
and NGOs are affected. Empowerment and participation are examined from the
perspective of those who reject their role as war victims. Part Two explores
the immediate and longer-term impacts of war and political violence, both on
those who survive, and on local and international workers who are concerned
to address its causes and consequences."
- Land,
Value and
Economic Development in Toledo
-- A Maya Perspective, by Gregory Ch'oc, Punta Gorda, Toledo, May 28, 1996
Today most of us live in a capitalist world where land is regarded as a
commodity--something that has an exchange value and can be traded. This
attitude has alienated land from man: man has relinquished his proper role
of stewardship and protector of land resources. This is one reason why the
plea to save the rainforests, the home of the Aboriginal people of Central
America often seem to be something belonging to another time. In the present
age of "progress", the concern about Aboriginal ties to the land
often seem to be anachronistic. The proprietary attitude of land ownership
usually destroys land stewardship, since the owners of land often buy and
sell land as an economic commodity, with little concern for such matters of
environmental degradation, pollution, erosion and so on.
·
Reframing Citizenship:
Indigenous Rights, Local Power and the Peace Process in Guatemala By Rachel
Sieder. Although
the civil war in Guatemala was not fought over ethnic claims for
self-determination, the peace process that brought the war to an end holds the
prospect of incorporating historically neglected indigenous demands into a
democratic national agenda. Given that the majority of Guatemalans are
indigenous, further democratization that is responsive to the ethnic diversity
of the country would radically transform Guatemalan politics and society.
One agreement in particular, the Accord on the Identity and Rights of
Indigenous Peoples (AIDPI), signed on 31 March 1995, is of primary importance.
It explicitly recognizes the multi-ethnic, culturally plural and multilingual
nature of Guatemala and the specific, collective rights of some six million
indigenous people.
·
State
Formation in Central America -- The Struggle for Autonomy, Development, and
Democracy By Howard H. Lentner (1993). This analysis of the four basic
components in the formation of states in Central America offers guidelines for
understanding worldwide strivings for autonomy, unity, economic development, and
democracy and examines Central American states.
- The
Challenge of Democracy in Central America
By the Swedish Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. Central
America has undergone remarkable democratic change in the last fifteen
years. In the beginning of the 1980s only Costa Rica was a democracy. In
1997 all five countries in the region are run by civilian presidents who
have been voted into office in elections deemed "free and fair" by
international observers. All five countries have also experienced a transfer
of power by elections.
- US
Bases in Central America and the Opposition to Them By Boone Schirmer Paper presented at “Crossroads
1991”, an international conference on U.S. bases, Manila, Philippines, May
14, 1990. The opposite side of this picture must also be stressed. The
Filipino people are not alone in their opposition to U.S. bases. They are
joined in this struggle by the efforts of people in Central America and
other parts of the world. These global struggles against U.S. military bases
will tend to place difficulties in the path of the offensive that the Bush
Administration seems in the process of developing against the Third World,
since this offensive depends so heavily on the continued presence of U.S.
foreign bases. Finally, these worldwide struggles will, in all likelihood,
give strength to the people of the Philippines in the achievement of their
goal of full national sovereignty.
o
Decentralization
and Recentralization: Lessons from the Social Sectors in Mexico and Nicaragua
Gershberg, Alec Ian (August 1998). The
Office of the Chief Economist of the IDB Working papers series disseminates the
findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about
development policy issues. This
study is designed to help practitioners prepare and evaluate institutional
reforms for education and health programs. It provides an analytic framework for
use by public officials and researchers, with case studies that illustrate a
wide range of actual practice, and a set of lessons learned. The framework uses
the concept of accountability to link the broad goals of reform to the key
dimensions of organizational arrangements. The case studies, based on fieldwork
in Mexico and Nicaragua, demonstrate a wide variety of available policy
instruments. Significantly, they also demonstrate that the responses to these
instruments are equally various: creative interpretation of central regulations
by local officials, self governing schools that complement public funds with
resources mobilized by fees, the reassertion of national control over previously
decentralized health programs. A lot of attention is paid to the how of reform;
the process of implementation is at least as important as the question of what
is to be reformed. The lessons derived from these experiences emphasize
contingent, rather than absolute, recommendations. Overall, the study suggests
how success in achieving greater efficiency, equity and democracy in the
management and delivery of social services requires a careful balance of
centralized and decentralized responsibilities.
General
- A
Framework for Teaching Democratic Citizenship: An International Project
By Charles F. Bahmueller, Center for Civic Education. Is it possible to
develop an international, cross-cultural consensus on the central meanings
and character of the ideas, values, and institutions of democracy and the
common elements of which education for democratic citizenship should
consist? A new project is attempting to answer this difficult and thorny
question. "Education
for Democratic Citizenship: A Framework," administered by the
Center for Civic Education, is an international project with a global
reach-with advisors and critics from every inhabited continent.
·
Strengthening
the Inter-American Human Rights System Report on the seminar organized by
the International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, February
2-6, 1998. Versión
en Español
·
The Misrepresentation of
Citizenship in Social Contract Theories. Modernist Civic Culture and Its
discontents A civic culture must perform effectively two related tasks: (1)
it must provide cultural resources capable of rendering intelligible to citizens
the standpoint proper to liberal democratic citizenship and (2) it must render
this standpoint intelligible in such a way as to generate in citizens the
motivation to develop the moral capacities required for citizenship.
Specifically modernist civic culture is defined by its use of Enlightenment
conceptions of reason and knowledge to carry out both of these functions.
·
What
Education for What Citizenship? (UNESCO Project). Designed
during the last half of 1993 and launched in January 1994, this is an attempt to
help improve educational strategies for citizenship education supported by
empirical cross-cultural evidence about the images of democratic
citizenship and the educational approaches and practices currently
utilized for that purpose in different countries. A first phase of
activities, consisting mainly of a comparative survey conducted in thirty-four
countries utilizing representative samples of students and teachers
at the secondary education level, and sampling students' parents as well,
is currently being completed. In 1996 was launched the second phase of
the project aimed at experimenting and evaluating the most striking
findings of the survey in actual school situations, with a view to developing effective
and adapted curriculum and pedagogical strategies for citizenship education
in fifteen countries. The third phase of the project, devoted to the dissemination
of knowledge and information in the field of citizenship education, has also
been initiated with the creation of the Citied international forum
on the topic, available through Internet, and the construction of an expert
system providing increased accessibility to research-based expertise on
citizenship education throughout the world.
·
Inter-American Development Bank Documents.
- Descentralización
en America Latina By
Gustavo Fernández. (April, 1996). “Decentralization in Latin America”
seeks to identify the main problems that decentralization creates for
governability in Latin America. The
author provides a holistic approach and sets out to systematize the norms
relative to decentralization. He
examines a federal country, a unitary country with regional
decentralization, and another unitary country.
He finally draws juridical conclusions.
The main focus of the document is political.
The main goal is to place problems of governability in their
context. He does not,
however, to provide a specialized analysis of each topic, nor to propose
alternative courses of action. The
main focus is South America. Fernández
does not provide a deep analysis of the decentralization experience in the
education and health sectors, because the transfer of these competences to
local governments has been undertaken recently and updated assessments are
not yet available.
- Public
Administration for Results:
Choice, Design and Sustainability ...
By
René Salgado (January 1997). This
paper suggests that increasing economic globalization and social
participation in Latin America and the Caribbean calls for reform of
public administration to make it more managerial, results-oriented and
responsive to citizens' needs. Institutional Development (ID) and Civil
Service Reform (CSR) are seen as tools of reform whose main goals are the
adequate transformation of structures, culture, and relationships between
public-sector management institutions and citizens. The paper discusses
operational issues pertaining to ID and CSR such as universe, scope and
sequencing, as well as mechanisms to strengthen the sustainability of
public administration reform efforts. The latter, in particular, calls for
the need to reinforce borrower's involvement throughout the project cycle,
and the design and implementation of consensus-building activities
relevant to the development of public-sector management.
- Decentralization
in Chile By Frances
Stewart and Gustav Ranis, 1994. This
document reviews the changes in decentralization that have accompanied the
changes in political regimes and some of their effects on various
dimensions affecting the human condition. Section II provides an overview
of the decentralization process, while Section III provides a more
detailed discussion of the nature and extent of decentralization achieved,
both under Pinochet and since, including changes in the system currently
being instituted. Section IV assesses the qualitative and quantitative
impact of these decentralization measures; Section V presents some
conclusions.
- War,
Peace and Third World Development
Dan Smith, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, 1994. Systemic
violence up to and including war is a chronic development problem. A
development agenda that fails to address violence is dealing with only
part of the needs of Third World countries and will probably not enjoy
much success. During 1993, there were 52 wars involving 42 war-torn
countries; in a further 37 violent countries, political violence was
widespread and even endemic without quite meriting the name of war; of
this total of 79 conflict countries, 65 are in the Third World.
- The
Comparative Advantage of Government: A Review
By Pedro Belli (October 1997). In
theory, market failures are necessary but not sufficient conditions for
justifying government intervention in the production of goods and
services. Even without market failures, there might be a case for
government intervention on the grounds of poverty reduction or merit goods
(for example, mandatory elementary education and mandatory use of
seatbelts in cars and of helmets on motorbikes).
In every case, contends Belli, a case for government intervention
must first identify the particular market failure that prevents the
private sector from producing the socially optimal quantity of the good or
service. Second, it must select the intervention that will most improve
welfare. Third, it must show that society will be better off as a result
of government involvement—must show that the benefits will outweigh the
costs.